Open Source Alternatives LogoOpen Source Alternatives
AlternativesBlogAdvertise
Open Source Alternatives LogoOpen Source Alternatives

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates about Alternatives

Open Source Alternatives LogoOpen Source Alternatives

Handpicked Open Source Alternatives to Paid Softwares

Product
  • Search
  • Categories
  • Tag
  • Sign In
Resources
  • Blog
  • Collection
  • Submit
  • Advertise your tool
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Sitemap
Copyright © 2026 All Rights Reserved.
Home/Categories/IT Management/Cachet
icon of Cachet

Cachet

Open source alternative to Atlassian Statuspage, Instatus and Better Stack

Cachet is a self-hosted status page system for communicating service incidents and maintenance windows to customers and internal teams. MIT licensed, built on Laravel.

15.1K stars

Repository

Stars
15.1K
Forks
1.6K
Latest
v2.4.1
Last commit
7 days ago
Last verified
Jun 6, 2026
Repo
cachethq/cachet ↗

Additional details

PHP
Active this week
Visit websiteGitHub repo
image of Cachet
Contents
  1. 01Who Cachet is for
  2. 02The problem it solves
  3. 03How it solves it
  4. 04Strengths and trade-offs
  5. 05Cachet vs alternatives
  6. 06Tech stack
  7. 07FAQ
  8. 08Similar open-source tools
TL;DR

Cachet is a self-hosted status page system for publishing incidents, component status, and uptime communication. It replaces hosted status page products such as Atlassian Statuspage and Instatus when teams need a simple public incident page they can run themselves. Cachet uses a custom license that permits use and modification but restricts standalone distribution.PHP · 15.1K stars · Active this week

who it's for

Who Cachet is for#

Small SaaS teams publishing service status

Cachet gives small infrastructure teams a public place for uptime and incident updates without paying for a hosted status page product.

Skip if:

Use Atlassian Statuspage if customers expect a vendor-backed page with managed subscriber delivery and enterprise status integrations.

Internal platform teams tracking component health

Teams can run Cachet for internal or partner-facing services where component status and incident history need to be easy to find.

Skip if:

Skip it if you need deep alert routing, on-call management, and incident automation in the same product.

the problem
tech stack · detected from GitHub

What it's built on#

Languages
PHP
Frameworks
Laravel
frequently asked

FAQ#

What is Cachet used for?
Can Cachet replace Atlassian Statuspage?
Is Cachet open source?
also worth a look

Similar open-source tools#

Gatus

Gatus

Check endpoints on a schedule and auto-publish a status page

11.2KGoApache-2.0
Language
PHP
Open issues
43
Contributors
215
First release
2014

Categories

IT ManagementSecurity & MonitoringCommunication & Collaboration

Tags

Self HostedMonitoringCustomer SupportDocumentationKnowledge BaseServer Management

The problem it solves#

how Cachet solves it

How it solves it#

Public component status

Cachet lets teams publish service components and their current status on a dedicated page. Users can see whether APIs, dashboards, regions, or background jobs are affected.

Incident communication

Teams can create incidents and updates so customers have a timeline during outages. This reduces repeated support explanations while keeping communication public and centralized.

Self-hosted status page

Cachet runs on your own infrastructure, giving teams control over the status page, incident data, and deployment model instead of relying on a hosted status vendor.

strengths · trade-offs

Strengths and trade-offs#

Strengths

  • Simple status communication modelCachet focuses on the core status page workflow: components, incidents, and updates. That makes it approachable for teams that do not need a full incident management suite.
  • Avoids hosted vendor dependencyA self-hosted status page can stay independent from the main application stack and from a third-party status provider. Teams can choose where and how it runs.

Trade-offs

  • -You own incident-page reliabilitySelf-hosting a status page only works if it stays available during outages. Teams should deploy Cachet separately from the systems it reports on.
  • -Custom license limits redistributionCachet's license allows use, modification, bundling, and contribution, but it does not allow distributing Cachet or modifications as a standalone product. Teams building a status-page product should review those terms first.
versus alternatives

Cachet vs alternatives#

Kener

Kener

Open source status page built with SvelteKit and SQLite

4.9KSvelteMIT
Prose

Prose

Decentralized open source workplace with chat and docs

36RustMPL-2.0
Passbolt

Passbolt

Open source team password manager with sharing and audit

6KPHPAGPL-3.0
MiroTalk

MiroTalk

Free browser-based video calls with no sign-up required

4.5KJavaScriptAGPL-3.0
Revolt

Revolt

Self-hosted open source Discord alternative with servers

2.3K

Cachet is used to publish status pages with components, incidents, and updates. It helps teams communicate downtime or degraded service to users.

Cachet can replace hosted status page tools for basic component status and incident communication. Atlassian Statuspage remains stronger for managed delivery, enterprise integrations, and vendor support.

When services fail, users need a clear place to check status without opening support tickets or refreshing social feeds. Hosted status page tools solve this communication problem, but they add another vendor dependency during incidents and can become expensive for small infrastructure teams.\u000A\u000ASome teams also want status data, incident history, and subscriber information under their own control. That is especially relevant when the status page describes private infrastructure, customer-specific components, or internal services.

Cachet vs Atlassian Statuspage\u000A\u000ACachet and Atlassian Statuspage both publish service health and incidents, but Cachet is self-hosted while Statuspage is a managed Atlassian product.\u000A\u000A| Criterion | Cachet | Atlassian Statuspage |\u000A| --- | --- | --- |\u000A| License | Custom license with standalone distribution limits | Proprietary SaaS |\u000A| Hosting | Self-hosted | Managed SaaS |\u000A| Core use | Components and incident updates | Managed status communication |\u000A| Best fit | Teams wanting status-page ownership | Teams wanting hosted reliability and integrations |\u000A\u000ACachet is the better choice when a team wants a simple status page under its own control. Statuspage is still better when managed availability, subscriber delivery, and enterprise support matter more than self-hosting.

Cachet publishes source code and permits use, modification, and bundling under its custom license. The license restricts standalone distribution of Cachet or modified versions, so product teams should review it before commercial redistribution.