Ardia vs Dia
Ardia and Dia share the same visual design language: both emerged from The Browser Company's design system. The core difference is that Dia is a closed-source browser with subscription elements, and Ardia is GPL-3.0 and free.
| Feature | Ardia | Dia |
|---|
| License | GPL-3.0 | Proprietary |
| Price | Free | Paid subscription |
| Cold launch | 280 ms | 2,262 ms |
| Memory (10 tabs) | 714 MB | 1,273 MB |
| Idle power | 3.5 mW | 848 mW |
| Ad blocking | Built-in uBlock Origin | Not built-in |
| Sync | iCloud Drive (E2E encrypted) | Dia's servers |
| AI features | None | Dia assistant |
Ardia is the better choice when you want the same visual design as Dia without the cost, when you want sync stored in your own iCloud Drive rather than Dia's servers, or when launch speed and idle power draw matter on a battery-constrained machine. The benchmarks are measured on identical hardware before each release.
Dia is worth choosing if you rely on its AI assistant or subscription features. Ardia does not include an AI layer.
Ardia vs Arc
Arc is no longer actively developed; The Browser Company shifted focus to Dia. Ardia preserves Arc's sidebar workflow for users who built their daily routine around it.
| Feature | Ardia | Arc |
|---|
| Status | Active (v0.2.42, Oct 2026) | Discontinued |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Proprietary |
| Price | Free | Free (was) |
| Sync | iCloud Drive (E2E encrypted) | Arc's servers |
| AI features | None | Arc Max (was) |
| Import from Arc | Yes (spaces, pins, themes) | n/a |
Ardia is the practical replacement for Arc users who want to stay on a Chromium sidebar browser without switching to Dia. The Arc importer brings spaces, pinned tabs, and themes along. Ardia does not replicate Arc Max's AI features.