Switch vs Witch
Witch ($14) and Switch cover the same core problem: macOS's native ⌘-Tab shows apps, not individual windows. Both add a per-window picker with type-to-filter. The key differences are price and source availability.
| Feature | Switch | Witch |
|---|
| Price | Free | $14 |
| License | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available) | Proprietary, closed |
| Type to filter | Yes | Yes |
| Cross-Space support | Yes | Yes |
| macOS requirement | macOS 14+ | varies |
Switch is the stronger fit when cost matters or when a source-available codebase is a requirement for auditing or internal tooling. Witch remains the better choice for users who need its rules-based window grouping, more granular appearance settings, or an app from an established macOS developer with a multi-year track record.
Switch vs Command-Tab Plus 2
Command-Tab Plus 2 is a paid macOS window switcher with per-window display and filtering, in the same category.
| Feature | Switch | Command-Tab Plus 2 |
|---|
| Price | Free | Paid |
| License | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available) | Proprietary, closed |
| Type to filter | Yes | Yes |
| Stage Manager support | Yes | varies |
Switch is the better pick for users who want the core per-window, type-to-filter experience without a purchase, and for those who need verified Stage Manager compatibility. Command-Tab Plus 2 is worth considering when its appearance and behavior customizations match a workflow Switch's current v0.3.x feature set does not cover.
Switch vs Scopo and Macscope
Scopo and Macscope are paid macOS window management tools in this category. Switch covers the same primary use case (per-window keyboard switching with filtering) at no cost. Switch is free; Scopo and Macscope carry a purchase price. Users with requirements specific to those apps should verify Switch's current changelog before switching.