Pi-hole vs NextDNS
Both tools offer DNS-level blocking with customizable blocklists, but they take different deployment approaches. Pi-hole runs on hardware you control; NextDNS is a subscription-based cloud service with no self-hosting option.
| Feature | Pi-hole | NextDNS |
|---|
| License | EUPL-1.2 | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Yes, required | No (cloud-only) |
| DNS query storage | Local only | NextDNS servers |
| Off-network coverage | Requires VPN | Native (no VPN needed) |
| Blocklist updates | Manual or scheduled | Automatic |
| Cost | Free (hardware only) | Free up to 300K queries/month, then paid |
Pi-hole is the better choice when privacy and data ownership matter most. Every DNS query stays on your hardware and never reaches a third-party server. NextDNS is the better fit when you need protection on mobile data and public Wi-Fi without maintaining a VPN, or when you want zero hardware to manage.
Pi-hole vs AdGuard DNS
AdGuard DNS is the cloud-managed tier of AdGuard's products, offering DNS-based filtering through their servers. Like NextDNS, it requires no hardware but routes your queries through AdGuard's infrastructure.
| Feature | Pi-hole | AdGuard DNS |
|---|
| Self-hosting | Yes | No |
| Data residency | Your hardware | AdGuard servers |
| License | EUPL-1.2 | Proprietary |
| Free tier | Unlimited (self-hosted) | Limited queries per day |
Pi-hole wins on data ownership and no ongoing costs. AdGuard DNS is a reasonable choice for users who do not want to maintain self-hosted hardware, particularly on mobile devices where Pi-hole has no native off-network coverage.