SearXNG vs Kagi
SearXNG and Kagi both serve users who want private search results without ad-supported tracking, but they operate on opposite models. Kagi is a commercial paid subscription service with no self-hosting option; SearXNG is AGPL-3.0 open source software you deploy on your own server.
| Feature | SearXNG | Kagi |
|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Yes | No |
| Pricing | Free (server costs only) | Paid monthly subscription |
| Search coverage | Aggregates 261 engines | Proprietary index with engine partnerships |
| User tracking | None by design | No ads; usage metadata retained |
| Tor support | Yes | No |
SearXNG is the stronger choice for users and organizations that need to self-host all their tools, enforce a data minimization policy at the query level, or avoid per-query or per-month costs. Its reliance on aggregating public search engines means result quality depends on those engines, with no proprietary ranking adjustments. Any team with a Linux server and basic sysadmin skills can run it at no licensing cost.
Kagi is worth considering when you want a fully managed, always-available search service with no infrastructure to operate. Kagi builds its own index and offers features like result ranking customization, AI-generated summaries, and lens-based filtering, none of which SearXNG provides natively. It suits users who are willing to pay a monthly subscription to avoid search ads but do not want to run their own server.