Haven vs Discord
Haven and Discord cover the same ground: text channels, threads, voice chat, screen sharing, reactions, stickers, and direct messages. The key difference is where the data lives. Discord stores everything on Discord Inc.'s servers; Haven stores it on the machine you run.
| Feature | Haven | Discord |
|---|
| Hosting | Your machine | Discord Inc.'s cloud |
| Account required | No email, no phone | Email and phone verification |
| Messages stored by | You | Discord Inc. |
| Direct message encryption | End-to-end | Not E2EE |
| Source code | AGPL-3.0 | Closed |
| Cost | Free, no paid tier | Freemium (Nitro for extras) |
| Telemetry | None | Analytics and tracking |
Haven is the better choice when data ownership matters: friend groups that want their messages off third-party infrastructure, homelab operators already running services, or anyone who cannot or will not register with a phone number. The Discord import tool and the Ferry bridge mean the migration does not require a hard cut.
Discord is still the better fit for large public communities (thousands of members), servers that depend on the Discord bot ecosystem, or anyone who needs zero infrastructure overhead and guaranteed uptime they do not have to manage.
Haven vs Slack
Slack and Haven overlap for small team messaging: channels, threads, search, and direct messages. Slack is a SaaS product with per-seat pricing; Haven runs on your own machine at no ongoing cost.
| Feature | Haven | Slack |
|---|
| Hosting | Self-hosted | Slack-managed SaaS |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium; paid plans per seat |
| Message history | Unlimited (your storage) | 90 days on free tier |
| Voice and screen sharing | Yes | Yes (Huddles) |
| Self-hosting | Yes | No |
| End-to-end encrypted DMs | Yes | No |
Haven is the better choice for small teams where message history loss on the free Slack tier is a pain point, or where per-seat pricing becomes a real cost as the team grows. The OpenID Connect support means Haven can connect to an existing SSO infrastructure.
Slack remains the better choice for teams that need broad third-party integrations (CRMs, ticketing, CI/CD bots), compliance features (SOC 2, audit logs at enterprise tier), or a managed service with guaranteed uptime and no operational overhead.