Torrie vs Folx Pro
Both Torrie and Folx Pro are native macOS applications built for downloading files, with torrent support as a central feature. The key decision is whether you need to pay for download scheduling and speed controls, or whether a free, extensible alternative covers your use case.
| Feature | Torrie | Folx Pro |
|---|
| License | MIT (free) | Proprietary (paid) |
| Price | Free | Paid (one-time or subscription) |
| Speed scheduling | Yes | Yes (Pro feature) |
| File selection in torrents | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin system | Yes (JSON-RPC, any language) | No |
| Web remote / API | Yes (JSON-RPC at port 9091) | No |
| Browser extension | No | Yes (Pro feature) |
| Themes | 16 built-in + custom JSON | Limited |
| Auto-updates | Notarized builds only | Yes |
| macOS version | macOS 12+ | macOS (various) |
Torrie is the better choice for users who want all of Folx Pro's scheduling and speed-limit features at no cost, plus a plugin system and JSON-RPC API for scripting download workflows. Because it is MIT licensed, there is no upgrade required to unlock any feature, and nothing is gated behind a Pro tier.
Folx Pro fits better when you rely on its browser extension for one-click download capture from Safari and Chrome. Torrie has no browser extension; adding a torrent requires dragging a .torrent file, clicking a magnet link, or pasting one with Cmd+U. For users whose workflow depends on browser-integrated download capture, Folx Pro's extension is a meaningful convenience that Torrie currently does not match.