Paseo vs Conductor
Conductor is a macOS desktop app that runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenCode in parallel local worktrees, with Conductor Cloud as a hosted add-on. Conductor announced on November 4, 2026 that it is joining Meta: new sign-ups are closed, Conductor Cloud shuts down on November 20, 2026, and the local app winds down in early 2027.
| Feature | Paseo | Conductor |
|---|
| License | Apache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android | macOS only |
| Cloud add-on | Paseo Hub | Conductor Cloud (closing Nov 20, 2026) |
Paseo and Conductor shared the same core idea: a GUI that runs multiple coding agents in parallel with isolated worktrees. Conductor focused on a polished macOS-only experience with a cloud collaboration layer. Paseo runs on every major OS, ships a full native mobile client, and is free and open source under Apache 2.0.
Given Conductor's announced wind-down, there is no meaningful scenario where new users should adopt it. Developers currently on Conductor should migrate to Paseo or another active orchestration tool before the local app winds down in early 2027.
Paseo vs Running Agents Directly
Developers who run Claude Code or Codex directly in a terminal get a single-session, single-window workflow with no shared view across agents. Paseo adds a daemon that manages multiple concurrent sessions, a diff and editor view, permission approval UI, mobile access, and a plugin system. The terminal CLI (paseo run, paseo attach) remains available for scripting. The orchestration layer is worth it for developers running more than one concurrent session; for single-session, desktop-only work, the extra setup is unnecessary.