Bbot vs Censys ASM
Both tools target attack surface discovery, but their models differ: Bbot is an open source CLI scanner you run on demand; Censys ASM is a commercial SaaS platform with continuous monitoring.
| Feature | Bbot | Censys ASM |
|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Local CLI or Docker | SaaS only |
| Cost | Free (self-hosted) | Enterprise subscription |
| Scanning | On-demand | Continuous |
| Output | Neo4j, Postgres, Slack, CSV, JSON, and more | Platform dashboard |
| Subdomain coverage | 20-50% more than comparable tools | Broad internet-wide index |
| API enrichment | SecurityTrails, Shodan, Chaos, and more | Proprietary data sources |
Bbot is the better choice when you need targeted recon on a specific scope, want full control over output format and scheduling, or cannot justify a paid subscription. The recursive engine outperforms single-pass tools on subdomain coverage, and the output module system sends results directly into your existing security infrastructure: Neo4j for graph analysis, Postgres or MySQL for querying, Slack or Discord for alerting. Bug bounty hunters and pentesters benefit from running custom preset combinations against any target type, without being constrained to organization profiles in a SaaS dashboard.
Censys ASM is the better fit for enterprise security teams that need continuous automated monitoring, historical exposure data from Censys's proprietary internet-scanning infrastructure, or a managed platform where discovery runs without manual scheduling. If the operational overhead of maintaining and running an open source CLI tool is a constraint, the SaaS model reduces that work.