Cate vs Conductor
Both tools address the same problem: running multiple AI coding agents in parallel with branch isolation and shared workspace state. Conductor was a paid, hosted service in this category; Cate is the MIT-licensed, self-hosted open source alternative.
Conductor stops working on 2026-11-20. Teams relying on it for orchestration need a replacement.
| Feature | Cate | Conductor |
|---|
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Hosting | Self-hosted desktop app | Hosted service |
| Agent support | Any agent CLI | Proprietary |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Active development | Yes | Ending 2026-11-20 |
Cate covers the full orchestration use case Conductor served: parallel agent sessions, one git worktree per branch, status visibility across sessions, and workspace sharing with other devices. Because Cate runs the actual agent CLIs in its own terminals rather than wrapping them in a proprietary interface, users keep access to every flag and configuration option those CLIs expose. The canvas layout, worktree management, and prompt queue system replace the coordination layer Conductor provided.