cmux vs Conductor
Conductor was an AI coding orchestrator that managed agent workflows through its own interface and workflow layer. Conductor reaches end of life on 2026-11-20. It is not a viable long-term choice for new setups.
cmux takes a different approach from what Conductor offered: it is a terminal app, not an orchestrator. Where Conductor managed the agent workflow for you, cmux gives you visible panes, notification rings, and workspaces and leaves workflow decisions to you. Teams moving away from Conductor can run their existing Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode commands directly in cmux workspaces without adopting a new agent management layer.
cmux vs Warp
Warp and cmux share a user: developers who run CLI-based tools and want a terminal with more intelligence than iTerm2 or Ghostty alone. The key differences are licensing, design philosophy, and AI integration.
| Feature | cmux | Warp |
|---|
| License | GPL-3.0 (app/CLI) | Proprietary |
| Pricing | Free (Pro tier optional) | Subscription |
| Rendering | libghostty, native Swift | Rust/GPU |
| AI features | Bring-your-own agent | Warp AI built-in |
| In-app browser | Yes, scriptable API | No |
| Notification rings | Yes | No |
| Platforms | macOS (iOS beta) | macOS, Linux, Windows |
Warp is the better choice if you want AI features built directly into the terminal: command completions, AI-generated commands, and a Warp-hosted AI workflow. Warp also supports Linux and Windows, which cmux does not yet.
cmux is the better choice if you are running multiple separate AI coding agents and need visibility across all of them. The notification system, the sidebar with per-workspace metadata, and the in-app browser with its scriptable API are purpose-built for multi-agent workflows. The macOS app and CLI are free and open source, with no subscription required.