Open Source Alternatives
  • Alternatives
  • Categories
    Categories by size904 projects
    • Developer Tools471
    • AI & Machine Learning407
    • Web Development198
    • Business & Productivity195
    • Security & Monitoring131
    • Communication & Collaboration128
    • IT Management126
    • Cloud & Hosting109
    • Product & Project Management106
    • Data & Analytics105
    Browse all 21 categoriesDesign & Creative, LLMOps & AI Tooling and 9 more
  • Blog
  • Advertise
SearchNotion, Slack, password manager.../
Submit
Open Source Alternatives
  • Alternatives
    • Developer Tools471
    • AI & Machine Learning407
    • Web Development198
    • Business & Productivity195
    • Security & Monitoring131
    • Communication & Collaboration128
    • Browse all 21 categories
  • Blog
  • Advertise
Submit your project

New open source projects by email

The projects we add and every new guide. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Open Source Alternatives LogoOpen Source Alternatives

Handpicked Open Source Alternatives to Paid Softwares

Product

  • Categories
  • Tag
  • Advertise

Resources

  • Blog
  • Collection
  • Submit

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Sitemap

Alternatives

  • Claude Code
  • Jira
  • Notion
  • Slack
  • Linear
  • Wispr Flow
  • All alternatives
© 2026 Open Source Alternatives. All rights reserved.
Open SourceAlternatives
Home/Categories/Developer Tools/Container
icon of Container

Container

Open source alternative to Docker Desktop and OrbStack

  • 50.8K stars
  • Apache-2.0
  • Active this week
  • Last commit today

Last verified Oct 23, 2026

Run Linux containers as lightweight VMs on Apple silicon Macs, using OCI-compatible images and a Swift-native CLI optimized for macOS 26.

Visit websiteGitHub50.8K starsDeploy on Hostinger
TL;DR

Container is Apple's open source CLI for running Linux containers as lightweight virtual machines on Apple silicon Macs. It replaces commercial container clients like Docker Desktop and OrbStack, offering Apache-2.0 licensing with no subscription fees. Install via a signed pkg from the GitHub releases page; requires macOS 26 and Apple silicon. Best for Mac developers who want a vendor-neutral, OCI-compatible container workflow without commercial licensing costs.

Read the full breakdownHide the full breakdownWho it is for, how it works, trade-offs, the quick start and the FAQ
who it's for

Who Container is for#

macOS developers running Linux containers locally

Container lets you pull and run standard OCI images directly on Apple silicon without a commercial client. Use it to spin up a development database, run a test container, or mirror a production Linux environment on your Mac.

Skip if:

Your team includes developers on Intel Macs, Windows, or Linux. Container requires Apple silicon and macOS 26; teams with mixed hardware need a cross-platform container tool.

Teams replacing Docker Desktop in commercial organizations

Docker Desktop added paid subscription requirements for commercial use in organizations above a certain size. Container provides an Apache-2.0-licensed path to the same OCI container workflow on macOS, without per-seat fees or subscription overhead.

Skip if:

Your organization is on a Docker Desktop plan that fits your budget, or you depend on Docker Desktop-specific features like the Extensions marketplace or its built-in Kubernetes integration.

Developers building and publishing OCI images on a Mac

Container builds OCI-compliant images that push to any standard registry. Build on Apple silicon and push to DockerHub or GHCR for deployment anywhere OCI images run, including Kubernetes clusters and cloud container services.

Skip if:

Your image builds already run in CI on Linux. Container is a local Mac tool; for automated build pipelines, a Linux runner is more portable and not hardware-restricted.

the problem

The problem it solves#

Running Linux containers on a Mac for development has historically required commercial clients that carry licensing restrictions and subscription fees. Docker Desktop requires a paid subscription for commercial use in organizations above a certain size; OrbStack is a commercial product. Developers and teams who want an open source, vendor-neutral path to Linux container workflows on their Mac have had to weigh these commercial options or piece together alternatives.

Apple silicon Macs benefit from container tooling built natively for their architecture, using macOS 26's Virtualization framework. Container runtimes from the x86 era require translation layers that add overhead on Apple silicon. Developers on Apple silicon who want native performance and full OCI compatibility have had few open source options.

how Container solves it

How it solves it#

OCI-compatible image registry support

Pulls from and pushes to any standard OCI container registry, including Docker Hub and GitHub Container Registry. Images built with Container conform to the OCI image spec, so they run in any other OCI-compatible application. No proprietary image format or vendor lock-in.

Lightweight VM isolation per container

Each container runs inside its own lightweight virtual machine using macOS 26's Virtualization framework. This gives stronger process isolation than namespace-based containers and runs a full Linux kernel, making it suitable for containers that expect a complete Linux environment.

Swift-native implementation for Apple silicon

Written entirely in Swift and built for Apple silicon, the tool avoids x86 translation overhead. It uses the Containerization Swift package for low-level container, image, and process management, and is maintained by Apple's own engineering team.

System service with start and stop control

Container runs as a macOS system service managed via `container system start` and `container system stop`. The XPC-based container-apiserver preserves forward and backward API compatibility within a major version, keeping scripts stable across updates.

Managed upgrade and downgrade path

The installer includes `update-container.sh` for upgrading to the latest release and `uninstall-container.sh` for removal. Downgrade to a specific version by stopping the service, uninstalling with the `-k` flag to keep user data, then running `update-container.sh -v 0.3.0`.

strengths · trade-offs

Strengths and trade-offs#

Strengths

  • Apache-2.0 with no commercial use restrictionsDocker Desktop requires a paid subscription for commercial use in organizations over a certain size; OrbStack is a commercial product. Container is Apache-2.0 licensed, which means you can use it commercially, modify it, and redistribute it without subscription fees or licensing agreements.
  • First-party Apple silicon optimizationBuilt by Apple's engineering team in Swift, Container is written specifically for Apple silicon and uses macOS 26's latest Virtualization framework. This is not an x86-first tool adapted to ARM; Apple silicon performance is the original design target.
  • Full OCI ecosystem compatibilityContainer consumes and produces images that conform to the OCI image spec. You pull from any standard registry, build locally, and push your images to DockerHub, GHCR, or any OCI-compatible target for deployment on Kubernetes or cloud container services.
  • Active development from AppleThe repo crossed 50,000 GitHub stars within months of its May 2025 launch and received commits as recently as October 2026. Apple accepts contributions through the Containerization Swift package's contributing guide.

Trade-offs

  • -Requires macOS 26 and Apple silicon exclusivelyContainer only runs on Apple silicon Macs with macOS 26. The maintainers explicitly state they do not support older macOS versions and will not address issues that cannot be reproduced on macOS 26. Teams with Intel Macs, Windows, or Linux development machines cannot use this tool.
  • -Experimental features lack backward compatibilityFeatures marked experimental, including the `k8s` subcommand, may change between releases without notice. Container application data provides forward compatibility only within one major version; upgrading across major versions may require a specific migration path.
  • -High open issue count on a young repositoryWith 579 open issues on a repo created in May 2025, the project is accumulating reports faster than it closes them. Teams that need a well-triaged, low-defect-density foundation for production workflows should factor in this early-stage issue density.
versus alternatives

Container vs alternatives#

Container vs Docker Desktop

Both Container and Docker Desktop run OCI-compatible Linux containers on a Mac. The key difference is licensing: Container is Apache-2.0 with no subscription requirements; Docker Desktop moved to a paid subscription model for commercial use in organizations over a certain employee count.

FeatureContainerDocker Desktop
LicenseApache-2.0Commercial (paid subscription for orgs above a size threshold)
Self-hostingLocal install (pkg)Local install
Apple siliconNative (required)Supported
macOS requirementmacOS 26 onlyOlder macOS supported
OCI compatibilityYesYes
Kubernetes integrationExperimentalYes (built-in)
PricingFreeFree personal; paid commercial

Container is the better choice for teams that want an Apache-licensed container workflow on Apple silicon without subscription overhead. Docker Desktop is the better fit when you need its built-in Kubernetes integration, the Docker Extensions marketplace, or support for Intel Macs and older macOS versions.

Container vs OrbStack

OrbStack and Container both run Linux containers on Apple silicon Macs. OrbStack is a commercial product; Container is open source under Apache-2.0.

FeatureContainerOrbStack
LicenseApache-2.0Commercial
PriceFreePaid subscription
OCI compatibilityYesYes
macOS requirementmacOS 26 onlyOlder macOS supported
Linux VM supportYes (per container)Yes
Management interfaceCLI onlyGUI available

Container is the right choice for developers who want a vendor-neutral, Apache-licensed tool and are comfortable with a CLI-only workflow on Apple silicon. OrbStack is worth considering when you want a graphical interface for managing containers and VMs, need to run on older macOS versions, or want a more polished out-of-box experience.

install · quick start

Quick start#

bash
Download the signed installer pkg from the GitHub releases page for macOS 26 and Apple silicon. To build from source instead, clone the repo and follow BUILDING.md.
```bash
git clone https://github.com/apple/container
```
After installation, start the system service and run a first container:
```bash
container system start
container run --rm alpine echo hello
```
tech stack · detected from GitHub

What it's built on#

Languages
Swift
frequently asked

FAQ#

Does Container require a paid subscription?

No. Container is Apache-2.0 licensed and free for all use, including commercial. There is no subscription, no per-seat pricing, and no feature tier. Download the installer from the GitHub releases page and run it at no cost.

What Mac hardware and macOS version does Container require?

Container requires an Apple silicon Mac (M1 or later) running macOS 26. It takes advantage of new virtualization and networking features in macOS 26 and will not run on older macOS versions or Intel Macs. The maintainers do not support older configurations.

Can I use Container to run Docker Hub images?

Yes. Container consumes OCI-compatible images from any standard registry, including Docker Hub. Pull and run an image with container run <image> just as you would with Docker. Images you build can be pushed back to Docker Hub or any OCI-compatible registry.

How is Container different from Docker Desktop?

Both run Linux containers on a Mac using OCI images. Container is Apache-2.0 licensed with no subscription requirements; Docker Desktop requires a paid commercial subscription for organizations above a certain size. Container requires macOS 26 and Apple silicon; Docker Desktop supports Intel Macs and older macOS versions.

Is the `k8s` subcommand in Container stable?

No. The k8s subcommand is explicitly marked experimental and does not guarantee backward compatibility between releases. For production Kubernetes workflows, check the current documentation before relying on it and expect that it may change.

also worth a look

Similar open-source tools#

Minikube

Alternative toDocker Desktop

Run a local Kubernetes cluster on macOS, Linux, or Windows

  • 32,203 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0

Kamal

Alternative toFly.io

Zero-downtime Docker deploys to any server, no managed platform.

  • 14,675 GitHub stars
  • MITLicence MIT

CapRover

Alternative toHeroku

Self-hosted PaaS: deploys any language, automatic HTTPS, zero fees.

  • 15,187 GitHub stars
  • CustomLicence Apache-2.0 with additional terms

Dokploy

Alternative toHeroku

Self-hosted PaaS to deploy apps and databases across multiple servers

  • 37,935 GitHub stars

Void Cloud

Alternative toVercel

Full-stack Vite toolkit with one-command Cloudflare deployment

  • 507 GitHub stars
  • MITLicence MIT

Keda

Alternative toKedify

Event-driven Kubernetes autoscaling with 70+ scalers and scale to zero

  • 10,646 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0
by category

Open source tools in these categories#

471

Developer Tools

REA (Reverse Engineer Anything), superpowers, Skills for Real Engineers
90

DevOps & CI/CD

Nvm, Uptime Kuma, Netdata
109

Cloud & Hosting

dify, RuView, rtk
Hostinger

Run Container on your own server

Self-host Container on a Hostinger VPS.

Deploy on Hostinger

Featured

Inbox Zero

Alternative toSuperhuman

AI email assistant that drafts replies and clears your inbox

  • 12,712 GitHub stars
  • AGPL-3.0Licence AGPL-3.0
  • #Email

rakazo

Alternative toGrok Bot

AI teammates you own: your keys, your model, your machine.

  • 4,904 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0
  • #AI Agents

Omnara

Alternative toCClaude Managed Agents

Open-source agent deployment API. Self-host or use Omnara Cloud.

  • 2,957 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0
  • #AI Agents
Feature your project

New open source projects by email

The projects we add and every new guide. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Find open source alternatives to paid software

/
  • Claude Code to OpenCode
  • Jira to Windshift
  • Notion to AppFlowy
  • Slack to Mattermost
  • Linear to GitLab
  • Wispr Flow to Handy
  • CapCut to Concat
  • Grok Bot to rakazo
  • Superhuman to Inbox Zero
  • Airtable to AITable
  • Muse to OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot to Cline
  • Datadog to Netdata
  • Microsoft Teams to Rocket.Chat
  • Confluence to Docmost
  • Pinecone to Qdrant
  • Zapier to n8n
  • Devin AI to OpenHands
  • Firebase to Supabase
  • 1Password to KeePassXC
  • Contentful to Strapi
  • Adobe Premiere Pro to Shotcut
  • ChatGPT to AnythingLLM
  • LangSmith to Langfuse
  • Claude Code to OpenCode
  • Jira to Windshift
  • Notion to AppFlowy
  • Slack to Mattermost
  • Linear to GitLab
  • Wispr Flow to Handy
  • CapCut to Concat
  • Grok Bot to rakazo
  • Superhuman to Inbox Zero
  • Airtable to AITable
  • Muse to OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot to Cline
  • Datadog to Netdata
  • Microsoft Teams to Rocket.Chat
  • Confluence to Docmost
  • Pinecone to Qdrant
  • Zapier to n8n
  • Devin AI to OpenHands
  • Firebase to Supabase
  • 1Password to KeePassXC
  • Contentful to Strapi
  • Adobe Premiere Pro to Shotcut
  • ChatGPT to AnythingLLM
  • LangSmith to Langfuse