Ghostex vs Conductor
Conductor is a paid workspace for Claude Code that stops working on November 20, 2026. Ghostex is the MIT-licensed alternative covering the same workspace role, supporting Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Grok, Cursor, and 20+ other agents.
| Feature | Ghostex | Conductor |
|---|
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| End of life | None | November 20, 2026 |
For developers currently using Conductor, migration to Ghostex requires only switching the workspace layer. Each Ghostex session runs as a real CLI instance of the underlying agent, so your existing agent sessions and history remain intact.
Ghostex vs Amp Code
Amp Code is a paid, proprietary coding agent. The core distinction from Ghostex is licensing and agent scope: Ghostex is MIT-licensed and runs any CLI agent you bring, while Amp Code is a commercial product.
| Feature | Ghostex | Amp Code |
|---|
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Cost | Free to run | Paid |
Ghostex suits developers who use multiple coding agents, want MIT-licensed software without a workspace subscription, or need agent-to-agent orchestration and mobile access. Amp Code may fit teams that prefer a single managed commercial product without the configuration overhead of an open source workspace.