Kandev vs Conductor
Conductor is a commercial platform for agentic development workflows that stops working on 2026-11-20.
Kandev covers the same parallel-agent orchestration use case with an AGPL-3.0 license, self-hosted infrastructure, and no telemetry. Teams migrating off Conductor before its end of life will find that Kandev's core workflow (plan, run agents in parallel, review diffs, open PRs) maps closely to what Conductor offered.
| Feature | Kandev | Conductor |
|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Yes | No |
| Parallel agent execution | Yes (isolated worktrees) | Yes |
| Multi-provider agents | 20+ CLIs via ACP | Limited |
| Human review gates | Plan, review, approval | Plan, review, approval |
| Plugin system | Community marketplace | Proprietary |
| MCP server support | Yes | Yes |
| Cost | Free (self-hosted) | Paid subscription |
Kandev's self-hosted model keeps code and agent conversations on your infrastructure with no vendor dependency and no seat pricing. The agent-neutral design connects any supported CLI without a provider relationship.
Teams that need a managed, vendor-supported platform with an enterprise SLA should note that Kandev is a community-supported project; operations, updates, and issue resolution fall on the team running it.