Maestro vs Conductor
Maestro and Conductor serve the same core use case: a dedicated interface for running multiple AI coding agents in parallel, with session management and monitoring above the raw CLI. Conductor is a proprietary commercial tool; Maestro is an AGPL-3.0 open source alternative you install locally.
Conductor is shutting down on November 20, 2026. It is not a viable option for new setups.
| Feature | Maestro | Conductor |
|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Local desktop binary | Commercial service |
| Supported agents | Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and more | Claude Code |
| Auto Run and playbooks | Yes | Yes |
| Git worktree support | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile remote control | Yes | No |
| Event-driven automation | Yes (Maestro Cue) | No |
| SSH remote execution | Yes | No |
| Headless CLI | Yes (maestro-cli) | No |
| Cost | Free (AI provider costs apply) | Paid subscription |
Maestro covers Conductor's headline features and extends them: multi-provider support across seven agents (Conductor supported Claude Code only), mobile remote control, event-driven automation through Maestro Cue, SSH remote execution for remote hosts, and a full headless CLI for scripting and CI/CD pipelines. For anyone evaluating tools for a new setup, Maestro is the right choice.
The AGPL-3.0 license covers personal and commercial team use without restriction. If you plan to offer a modified version as a managed service to external users, AGPL-3.0 requires publishing the source changes.